Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 So. 2d 1239 - Lott v. State

695 So. 2d 1239 - Lott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2018

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

140199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solventes Y Quimica de Nicaragua, S.A. Solquimisa v. Weaver · 615 So. 2d 688 - Spencer v. State · 511 So. 2d 526 - Rogers v. State · 648 So. 2d 85 - Jackson v. State · Walls v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may not have been conscious at the time that Lott made the fatal slash which caused her death, the physical torture and emotional trauma she suffered during the time leading up to her death justify application of the HAC aggravator.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Based on the evidence, this crime occurred over a period of time. From the minute Defendant entered the home until the victim was choked into unconsciousness (hopefully), she suffered unspeakable humiliation, terror, and pain. She was so afraid she defecated on herself, her panties with feces on them were removed in one bedroom, she was completely nude and died in the master bedroom. Her mouth, wrist, and ankles were taped making her totally defenseless. Plier marks were on her arm. The State suggests the pliers were used to get her to tell her attacker(s) her ATM number. That is a reasonable possibility and perhaps the least onerous. There is no way of knowing how long this torturous assault lasted, but common sense dictates that it could not have been brief. Once the Defendant got everything he needed from [the victim], he deliberately slashed her throat, and to be sure she was dead, he stabbed her in the back. These acts were definitely conscienceless, pitiless, and unnecessarily torturous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, a foundation must first be laid to establish that the person testifying as to the witness's reputation is aware of the witness's reputation for truthfulness in the community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.