Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

cited by 1 later decisions

states following

May 1998

most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 534 So. 2d 393 - State v. Pennington · Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · Brunson v. State · 569 So. 2d 1273 - First Fidelity Bank, N.A., New Jersey v. District Court of Appeal, Fourth District · State v. Agee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“It seems to me relatively clear that the 15-day recapture window afforded by what is now rule 3.191(p)(3) was intended to provide the state with a grace period of last resort to save its case from dismissal for failure to comply with the time periods mandated by the speedy trial rule. A prosecutor who must rely on the 15-day recapture window does so at his or her peril if the trial cannot be scheduled within that window through no fault of the defendant. To permit the state to extend the speedy trial period after it has run, during the recapture window, would be inconsistent with the limited nature of the relief intended by that provision. A strict interpretation of the provision reinforces the state's obligation under the rule to bring the defendant to trial within the speedy trial period, or to file a motion seeking an extension of that period before it has run.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. 715 So. 2d 241 - Brown v. State
“whether the rule authorizes an extension of the speedy trial time when the extension is made during the recapture window (for a reason which constitutes an `exceptional circumstance' under 3.191( l )), or whether an `exceptional circumstances' extension is valid only when granted before expiration of the basic 175-day period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 715 So. 2d 241 - Brown v. State
“IS AN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCE EXTENSION UNDER [FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(l) ] VALID, WHEN MADE AND OBTAINED DURING THE 5/10-DAY RECAPTURE WINDOW PROVIDED FOR IN RULE 3.191(p)(3), OR IS IT LIMITED ONLY TO AN EXTENSION MADE AND OBTAINED BEFORE EXPIRATION OF THE BASIC 175-DAY PERIOD PROVIDED IN RULE 3.191(a)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 715 So. 2d 241 - Brown v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.