Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 So. 2d 209 - Click v. State

695 So. 2d 209 - Click v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2016

23 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Edwards v. Arizona · Berkemer v. McCarty · Darden v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a waiver is voluntary, knowing, and intelligent depends on the particular facts and underlying circumstances of each case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused—i.e., the totality of the circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"` . . . [T]he fact that the questioning occurred at the police station does not necessarily lead to a conclusion that appellant was in custody for Miranda purposes. "`"[P]olice officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone they question. Nor is the requirement of warnings to be imposed simply because the questioning takes place in the station house, or because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect." "`Oregon v. Mathiason , 429 U.S. 492 , 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711 , 714 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"[T]he statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified, and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not specified at trial."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.