Rolling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 702 So. 2d 186 - Chandler v. State (1997), 787 So. 2d 747 - Stephens v. State (2001)
1 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · Irvin v. Dowd · Massiah v. United States · South Dakota v. Opperman · Sheppard v. Maxwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the extent and nature of any pretrial publicity; and (2) the difficulty encountered in actually selecting a jury.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an entry based on an exigency must be limited in scope to its purpose. Thus, an officer may not continue her search once she has determined that no exigency exists.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the court must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.