Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

695 So. 2d 499

Craig v. Craig

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-06-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2004

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Former Wife appeals a final judgment of the trial court equitably distributing the parties’ assets and liabilities, establishing child visitation, and denying her request for attorney fees. As to the denial of attorney fees and the requirement that the parties comply with the Twelfth Judicial Circuit visitation schedule, no abuse of discretion is shown, and we affirm. However, as to the equitable distribution scheme, we must reverse and remand because the trial court diminished the parties’ marital assets with non-marital debts incurred after the established date of valuation without findings that might support this ruling.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
/695/so2d/499 · .json · Public domain