Bolden v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 534 So. 2d 602 - Perry v. Brakefield · 406 So. 2d 988 - Liberty Loan Corp. of Gadsden v. Williams · 587 So. 2d 1012 - Parks v. State · 621 So. 2d 1282 - Jefferson County v. SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS · 632 So. 2d 462 - Brown v. Lawrence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““that in order to preserve the issue for appeal, the party who suffers an adverse ruling on a motion in limine must take some action at trial (whether it is to proffer the excluded evidence or to object to the proffered evidence and assign grounds) ‘unless he or she obtains the express acquiescence of the trial judge that a subsequent [proffer of the excluded evidence or] objection and assignment of grounds are not necessary.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. A.E.C. v. J.R.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.