Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 SO2D 58 - Walker v. Walker

Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2017

8 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · 589 So. 2d 687 - Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy Sheriffs · Brooks v. Peoples Nat. Bank of Huntsville · REYNOLDS v. BIRNBAUM · 464 So. 2d 527 - Nicholas v. Nicholas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In 1995 our legislature amended § 30-2-51 , Ala. Code 1975, effective January 1, 1996, to address the division of a spouse's retirement benefits. . . . "Pursuant to § 30-2-51 (b), a trial court has discretionary authority, if the conditions of § 30-2-51 (b)(1), (2), and (3) are met , to include the present value of any current or future retirement benefits that a spouse has a vested interest in or is receiving."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In 1995 our legislature amended § 30-2-51 , Ala. Code 1975, effective January 1, 1996, to address the division of a spouse's retirement benefits. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.