Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 SO2D 62 - Kiracofe v. B E & K Construction Co.

Kiracofe v. B E & K Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 870 - West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida · Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc. · 652 So. 2d 287 - Whitsett v. BAMSI, Inc. · Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg · Wolfe v. Dunlop Tire Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A trial court is not bound to accept a physician’s assigned impairment rating and is free to make its own determination as to an employee’s impairment. The impairment rating assigned by a physician is but one factor a court may consider in satisfying its duty to determine the extent of one’s disability. The trial court has the duty to determine the extent of disability and is not bound by expert testimony in making that determination; yet, in making its determination, it must consider all the evidence, including its own observations, and it must interpret the evidence in accordance with its own best judgment.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.