695 So. 2d 644 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Cogdell v. United States · Prestidge v. United States · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the appellant `opened the door' for the admission of his prior juvenile adjudications by denying[, on direct examination,] that he had ever been involved in anything similar to the offense for which he was charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. State“The disposition of a child and evidence given in a hearing in the court shall not be admissible as evidence against him in any case or proceeding in any other court whether before or after reaching majority. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.