Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart · Barfield v. State · 660 So. 2d 269 - State v. Darrisaw · 692 So. 2d 1017 - Scott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 921.001(8) speaks in terms of both an increase in the offenses (“escalating”) and some recurring feature of the offenses (“pattern”). If the offenses meet the definition of “escalating,” then the “pattern” requirement can be satisfied either where the offenses are committed in temporal proximity or where there is a similarity of offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hogan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.