Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 F.2d 109 - Doe v. Harris

Doe v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

696 F.2d 109 · 1982

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 20 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Better Government Association v. Department of State National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of Interior (1986), Aamer v. Obama (2014)

23 federal appellate · 20 district ·

3901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 38 U.S.C. § 3301

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Weinstein v. Bradford · County of Los Angeles v. Davis · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “with assurance that 'there is no reasonable expectation ...' that the alleged violation will recur”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “from the record that Doe remains under investigation for fraudulent receipt of unemployment compensation, and that the likelihood that he will be indicted is appropriately described as a reasonable expectation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.