Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 F.2d 1277 - United States v. Edwards

United States v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

696 F.2d 1277 · 1983

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
5
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Calderon (1997), United States v. Thai (1994)

65 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

37019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Santoni v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · United States v. Beechum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. — Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness’ credibility ... may, however, in the discretion of the court, if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness (1) concerning the witness’ character for truthfulness or untruthfulness....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “wait to hear the verdict before contesting the impartiality of the jury and then attack the court's refusal to investigate his allegation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.