Johnson v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.2d 1334 · 1983
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably United States v. Woods (1989), United States v. Redd (1985)
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3152 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 4082 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Udall v. Tallman · Singleton v. Wulff · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he law is clear that, absent special circumstances, defenses not presented and for which proof is not offered in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thelma V.A. Gibson, Catherine H. Fahringer, F. Lee Bailey, Richard E. Gerstein, Edward A. Carhart, Paul M. Rashkind, Ronald C. Dresnick, Bonnie Rippingille, D/B/A Bailey, Gerstein, Carhart, Rashkind, Dresnick & Rippingille, P.A., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, Crossclaim David L. Paul, Intervenor-Appellant v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver, a United States Agent and Instrumentality, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, Crossclaim Centrust Bank, a Florida State Savings Bank, Citibank, N.A., a National Association, Centrust Federal Savings Bank, a Federal Savings Bank, Thelma V.A. Gibson, Catherine H. Fahringer, F. Lee Bailey, Richard E. Gerstein, Edward A. Carhart, Paul M. Rashkind, Ronald C. Dresnick, Bonnie Rippingille, D/B/A Bailey, Gerstein, Carhart, Rashkind, Dresnick & Rippingille, P.A., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, Crossclaim David L. Paul, Intervenor v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver, a United States Agent and Instrumentality, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, Crossclaim Centrust Bank, a Florida State Savings Bank, Citibank, N.A., a National Association, Centrust Federal Savings Bank, a Federal Savings Bank · Ross v. Hopper“The law is clear that: `The Constitution does not require that things different in fact be treated in law as though they were the same. But it does require, in its concern for equality, that those who are similarly situated be similarly treated. The measure of the reasonableness of a classification is the degree of its success in treating similarly those similarly situated,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A preliminary step in equal protection analysis is to determine whether persons who are similarly situated are subject to disparate treatment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.