United States v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.2d 282 · 1982
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Owens (1988), 128 Ill. 2d 66 - People v. Flores (1989)
41 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Everett C. McKethan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we realize that the question that arises under the Rules of Evidence is not necessarily the same as that presented under the confrontation clause.... Something more may be required under the confrontation clause....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“refused to testify at all, thus rendering Rule 801(d)(1) inapplicable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.