Johnson v. King’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.2d 370 · 1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997 (Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act)
Relies on Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Patsy v. Florida International University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the Attorney General has certified or the court has determined that such administrative remedies are in substantial compliance with the minimum acceptable standards promulgated under subsection (b).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nicks v. Huffman · Collins v. King“he was improperly written up for violations of prison disciplinary rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Collins v. King“it would be appropriate and in the interest[s] of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nicks v. Huffman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.