Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 F.2d 473 - United States v. Hazel

United States v. Hazel’s Empirical Analysis

696 F.2d 473 · 1983

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably Wayte v. United States (1985), State v. Keene (1998)

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

4001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7205

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Oyler v. Boles · Gray v. United States · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · Citizens & Southern National Bank v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] hearing is necessary only when the motion alleges sufficient facts to take the question past the frivolous state and raises a reasonable doubt as to the prosecutor's purpose.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the government's discriminatory selection of him has been invidious or in bad faith, i.e., based upon such impermissible considerations as race, religion, or the desire to prevent the exercise of his constitutional rights.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.