Chu Drua Cha v. Noot’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.2d 594 · 1982
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Beno v. Shalala (1994), Lankford v. Sherman (2006)
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 8 U.S.C. § 1521 (§ 411 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1522 (§ 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1523 (§ 413 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Rideout v. United States · Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc. · Johnson v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]n questions of law we owe no deference in any formal sense to the District Court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Bell · Bell v. Sellevold“there is a substantial probability, because of the legal interconnections between the two programs and because of their joint administration as a practical matter, that recipients could reasonably have had a legitimate expectation that their [refugee] benefits would not be terminated without their being given an opportunity to show that the same payment level should be continued under the AFDC rubric.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Noot
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.