Keathley v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.3d 644 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 611 (§ 216 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973G (§ 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Howell · Kimani v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he only way to determine whether a person has violated a criminal statute is to examine both the elements of that law and all defenses properly raised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.