United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) the evidence tends to prove a material point; (2) the other act is not too-remote in time; (3) the evidence is sufficient to support a finding that defendant committed the other act; and (4) (in certain cases) the act is similar to the offense charged.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Ramos-Atondo · United States v. Decinces

2. “supported defendant's defense). CONCLUSION We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in requiring Carpenter to publicly file her pretrial offer of proof, and that while the court erred in admitting evidence of Velazquez's methamphetamine use, the error was harmless. AFFIRMED. 1 We consider only two claims raised by Carpenter and Velazquez in this opinion. A concurrently filed memorandum disposition addresses their remaining claims. 2 The actual weapon used was a cattle prod. 3 A defendant must establish three elements to present a duress defense:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. United States v. Carpenter

3. “If the evidence meets this test under Rule 404(b), the court must then decide whether the probative value is substantially outweighed by the prejudicial impact under Rule 403.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 379 F. Supp. 3d 1152 - United States v. Flett