Ridore v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.3d 907 · 2012
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United States · Lopez v. Ashcroft · De Martinez v. Ashcroft · Azanor v. Ashcroft · Kaplun v. Attorney General of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e have the testimony of [an expert] who testified that clearly this individual upon his return back to Haiti will be turned over to the Haitian authorities who will immediately intern him in one of their prison facilities where he will be held indefinitely . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“adverse factors ... with the social and humane considerations presented on his (or her) behalf to determine whether the granting of relief appears in the best interest of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nguyen v. Sessions“the BIA's list of equities differed from those set forth by the IJ, and the BIA therefore 'overturn[ed] the IJ's findings and enter[ed] its own findings of fact.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adeyanju v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.