Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 FSUPP 540 - Montero v. Meyer

Montero v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973A (§ 3 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973B (§ 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Allen v. State Board of Elections · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New York · Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Lundgrin v. Claytor · Deerfield Medical Center v. City of Deerfield Beach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f sufficient signatures remained to satisfy the requirement of Colorado law for certifying an initiative for the ballot after all signatures appearing on petitions circulated in any of the 12 'bilingual counties' had been stricken, then failure to comply with the Voting Rights Act would not prohibit the ballot initiative from proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A jurisdiction required to provide minority language materials is only required to publish in the language of the applicable language minority group materials distributed to or provided for the use of the electorate generally. Such materials include, for example, ballots, sample ballots, informational materials, and petitions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.