Klein v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 32 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Withrow v. Larkin · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co. · Fmc Corporation v. Manitowoc Company Inc · Carter v. United States Department of Commerce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he disciplinary proceedings, as instituted against Klein, were neither per se nor in their application violative of [Klein's] constitutional right to due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klein v. Peterson“whether there was substantial evidence to support the action of the Patent Office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klein v. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.