In Re Hardinge, Inc. Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 781 · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘sufficiently connected to Defendants’ existing disclosures to make those public statements misleading’ ” (quoting In re FBR Inc. Sec. Litig., 544 F.Supp.2d 346, 356 (S.D.N.Y.2008))). . Operating Local 649 Annuity Trust Fund v. Smith Barney Fund Mgmt. LLC, 595 F.3d 86, 92 (2d Cir.2010) (quotation marks and citation omitted). . See Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). . Id. . 15 U.S.C.A. § 78u-4(b)(2) (2010). . Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 193 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976). . South Cherry St., LLC v. Hennessee Grp. LLC, 573 F.3d 98, 109 (2d Cir.2009) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.