Johns v. Cloud’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 685 So. 2d 691 - Hayes v. Autin · 600 So. 2d 829 - Donaghey v. Cumis Ins. Soc. · 657 So. 2d 188 - Dauzat v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this individual remains excluded from coverage unless he is no longer a resident of the household of the insured. Once he moves away from that particular residence, the exclusion no longer applies. That person is treated as other individuals who use this car who are not residents of the insured's home.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“L. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph B(2) of this Section, an insurer and an insured may by written agreement exclude from coverage any named person who is a resident of the same household as the named insured. (Emphasis ours).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hodge v. Austin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.