Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 SO2D 140 - Ackel v. Ackel

Ackel v. Ackel’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2010

10 state decisions

50199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 350 So. 2d 881 - George Engine Co., Inc. v. Southern Shipbldg. Corp. · 292 So. 2d 686 - Stone v. Stone · Mt. Airy Refining Co. v. Clark Acquisition, Inc. · Lybrand v. Newman · 608 So. 2d 256 - Angelica v. Angelica

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “La. R.S. 9:4201 provides, as follows: A provision in any written contract to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of the contract, or out of the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing between two or more persons to submit to arbitration any controversy existing between them at the time of the agreement to submit, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. La. R.S. 9:4209 provides, as follows: At any time within one year after the award is made any party to the arbitration may apply to the court in and for the parish within which the award was made for an order confirming the award and thereupon the court shall grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in R.S. 9:4210 and 9:4211. Notice in writing of the application shall be served upon the adverse party or his attorney five days before the hearing thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The presence of an arbitration clause in a contract does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to determine the underlying contact's validity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a party may not seek annulment of the underlying contract after going to arbitration and receiving an adverse judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.