Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 So. 2d 410 - Mitchell v. State

696 So. 2d 410 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · Witt v. State · 498 So. 2d 863 - Whitehead v. State · Jones v. State · State v. Callaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 3.850 provides an exception for its two-year time limit for raising claims, which involve fundamental constitutional rights not established until after the two-year time has run. Like most cases, Leroux represents an "evolutionary refinement" in the criminal law, not a change of constitutional dimension. Consequently, it does not merit retroactive application in a collateral proceeding brought after the two-year time limit has run.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.