Harris v. Monds’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 430 So. 2d 448 - Smith v. State · 662 So. 2d 930 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct · 574 So. 2d 100 - DEPT. OF HEALTH REHAB. SERV. v. Whaley · 676 So. 2d 500 - HOLLYWOOD LAKES CIVIC ASS'N v. Hollywood · 548 So. 2d 883 - Hutchinson v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appellant is unable to establish facts sufficient to support a finding that [Officer Knipp] acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting a wanton and willful disregard of [appellant's] safety, [Officer Knipp] will be entitled to a judgment in [his] favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.