696 So. 2d 457 - WI v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 497 So. 2d 240 - Fischer v. Knuck · 488 So. 2d 627 - Caleffe v. Vitale · 659 So. 2d 692 - Altingeyik v. State · 654 So. 2d 1004 - Duest v. Goldstein · Pool Water Products, Inc. v. Pools by LS Rule
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no real basis for disqualification. The fact that the judge conveys this information does not automatically require the judge to be disqualified upon a request by either party, but the issue should be resolved on a case-by-case basis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"While the fact that the presiding judge prosecuted petitioner in a previous case does not present a direct conflict of interest, it does support petitioner's claim of a well founded fear that he will not receive a fair trial before this judge. Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.160(d); section 38.10, Fla. Stat. (1995)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.