Ziermann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 689 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Hunter · 500 So. 2d 519 - Lawhorne v. State · Johnson v. State · 666 So. 2d 176 - Vann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]f appellant had been permitted to explain that he pled guilty in the prior case because he was guilty, the implied assertion would be that he was not guilty in this case because he chose to go to trial.” [[Image here]] [1]f [appellant’s] prior convictions were for serious crimes, the inference that [he] entered pleas to them because, unlike this case, he was guilty of those crimes, is strengthened. This allows the permissible inference that [he] admits even serious crimes when guilty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. State · Reese v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.