State v. Schiano’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 525 So. 2d 875 - Holloman v. State · 689 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Hunter · Oisorio v. State · State v. Moses · Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motions Requiring a Response from the State Attorney. Unless the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the defendant is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file, within the time fixed by the court, an answer to the motion. The answer shall respond to the allegations contained in the defendant’s sufficiently pleaded claims, describe any matters in avoidance of the sufficiently pleaded claims, state whether the defendant has used any other available state postcon-viction remedies including any other motion under this rule, and state whether the defendant has previously been afforded an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lundy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.