Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

696 So. 2d 774

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-11-20

Relies on Anders v. California · Wilson v. State

Decided 1996-11-20

PER CURIAM.

¶1The defendant, Christopher R. Lee, challenges his judgments and sentences. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Lee’s conviction without discussion. However, because the trial court imposed a public defender lien without advising Lee of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien, we remand for the trial court to allow Lee thirty days from the date of the mandate to file a written objection to the amount assessed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1); Wilson v. State, 675 So.2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). If an objection is filed, the trial court shall strike the assessment and shall not impose a new lien without notice and hearing. Id.We affirm the sentence in all other respects.

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.
/696/so2d/774 · .json · Public domain