Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 So. 2d 833 - Fallschase Development Corp. v. Blakey

696 So. 2d 833 - Fallschase Development Corp. v. Blakey’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2018

9 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 658 So. 2d 55 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet · Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi · KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar Grove · Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp. · 383 So. 2d 610 - Iglehart v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If a nonvested property interest . . . was created before October 1, 1988, and is determined in a judicial proceeding commenced on or after October 1, 1988, to violate this state's rule against perpetuities as that rule existed before October 1, 1988, a court, upon the petition of an interested person, may reform the disposition in the manner that most closely approximates the transferor's manifested plan of distribution and is within the limits of the rule against perpetuities applicable when the nonvested property interest . . . was created." [e.s.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “I am also unaware of a vested right to have a court strike down an obligation voluntarily undertaken as part of an enforceable written legal agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “operate retrospectively `in the sense that all pending proceedings, including matters on appeal, are determined under the law in effect at the time of the decision....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.