Hamilton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. California · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · 536 So. 2d 212 - Glendening v. State · 161 So. 2d 864 - Darty v. State · Page v. Zordan Ex Rel. Zordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“case law still limits the admissibility of expert opinions on ultimate issues when the testimony's probative value may be substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.