Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 SO2D 940 - State v. Goodman

State v. Goodman’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2011

3 state decisions

10199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · United States v. Marion · Crist v. Bretz · United States v. Gouveia · 497 So. 2d 875 - Koenig v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We strongly disapprove of the state’s improper use of peremptory challenges to strike a prospective juror on account of the juror’s race. Equally, however, we condemn the state’s petulant refusal to try its case to a jury containing a member whom it had improperly sought to strike.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.