Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 696 SW2D 388 - Crosby v. State

Crosby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Katz v. United States · Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Biswell · Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States · Green v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every permittee shall have and maintain exclusive occupancy and control of the entire licensed premises in every phase of the storage, distribution, possession, and transportation and sale of all alcoholic beverages purchased, stored, or sold on the licensed premises. Any device, scheme, or plan which surrenders control of the employees, premises or business of the permittee to persons other than the permittee shall be unlawful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “By Accepting a license or permit, the holder consents that the commission, an authorized representative, or a peace officer may enter the premises at any time to conduct an investigation or inspect the premises for the purpose of performing any duty imposed by this code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.