Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 F.2d 1200 - United States v. Head

United States v. Head’s Empirical Analysis

697 F.2d 1200 · 1982

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Richardson v. United States (1984), United States v. Duncan (1988)

70 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

4601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Burks v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Green v. United States · Abney v. United States · Rideout v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must embrace both a perception that a claim that is manifestly 'double jeopardy' in substantive content is wholly lacking in merit, and a perception that a claim advanced as one of 'double jeopardy' is manifestly not that in substantive content.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “double jeopardy guarantees are not engaged by collateral estoppel which, if applied, would merely restrict proof but not make conviction impossible.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “intervene sua sponte in the proceedings in order to control them.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.