Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 F.2d 1333 - Alvarez v. Longboy

Alvarez v. Longboy’s Empirical Analysis

697 F.2d 1333 · 1983

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. (1983), Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers (1990)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

3401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2041

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Linda R. S. v. Richard D. · Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress may enact statutes creating legal rights, the invasion of which creates standing, even though no injury would exist without the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the court finds that the respondent has intentionally violated any provision of this chapter or any regulation prescribed hereunder, it may award damages up to and including an amount equal to the amount of actual damages, or $500 for each violation, or other equitable relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the term 'intentional' in Section 2050a(b) means conscious or deliberate and does not require a specific intent to violate the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.