Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 F.2d 135 - Loveday v. Davis

Loveday v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

697 F.2d 135 · 1983

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
March 2010
most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably McMillan v. Barksdale (1987), Ford v. Seabold (1988)

27 federal appellate ·

2701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Townsend v. Sain · Brewer v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not receive a full, fair, and adequate hearing in the State court proceeding”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “adequately resolved the factual issues contained in the petitioner's constitutional claim,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.