Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 F.2d 231 - United States v. Carlson

United States v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

697 F.2d 231 · 1983

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
4
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably United States v. DeLuna (1985), United States v. Orr (1988)

47 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

4101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Marion · Santoni v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evince a strong preference for searches made pursuant to warrant, and, in some instances, may sustain them where warrantless searches based on a police officer's evaluation of probable cause might fail.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[R]eviewing courts should interpret affidavits in a commonsense and realistic fashion, and deference is to be accorded an issuing magistrate's determination of probable cause.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entitled to assess probable cause in light of his experience.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.