Devine v. White’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.2d 421 · 1983
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2013 · most notably Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management (1985), Cornelius v. Nutt (1985)
53 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1918 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 3333 · 5 U.S.C. § 4303 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 5 U.S.C. § 7101 · 5 U.S.C. § 7103
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Udall v. Tallman · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such a shift from the arbitral model, in which decision makers are free to focus solely on the case before them rather than on the case as it might appear to an appellate court, to the administrative model, in which decision makers are often concerned primarily with building a record for review, would substantially undercut the ability of arbitrators successfully to resolve disputes....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]rbitration of [labor] disputes is faster, cheaper, less formal, more responsive to industrial needs, and more conducive to the preservation of ongoing employment relations than is litigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Notwithstanding any other provision of law,” section 7703(b)(1) declares, such petitions “must be filed within 30 days after the date the petitioner received notice of the final order or decision” of the arbitrator. This requirement is jurisdictional, Miller v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 148, 149 (5th Cir.1982); Parton v. MSPB, 684 F.2d 530, 533 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam); Boehm v. Foster, 670 F.2d 111, 113 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam), and the statutorily specified filing period is not subject to enlargement, Brown v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 673 F.2d 544, 545 (D.C.Cir.1982) (per curiam); see Fed.R.App.P. 26(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.