In re Grand Jury Matter’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.2d 511 · 1982
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2017
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · Garber v. United States · In re Grand Jury Proceedings · Lance v. United States Department of Justice · In re Grand Jury Matter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o meaningful distinction... between transcripts and witness interviews conducted outside the grand jury's presence but presented to it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“summaries that reveal nothing about what transpired before the grand jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ford v. Comm'r“reveals the contents of grand jury proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.