Hyde v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.2d 614 · 1983
Citation profile
61 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably 599 So. 2d 1058 - Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992), Johnson v. Offshore Express, Inc. (1988)
61 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santoni v. United States · Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · United Mine Workers, Local No. 1854 v. National Labor Relations Board · 102 S. Ct. 969 - United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny amount awarded for pain and suffering depends to a great extent on the trial court's observation of the plaintiff and its subjective determination of the amount needed to achieve full compensation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Under our well established law, an owner is not liable to third parties for the negligent acts of a contractor where the contractor undertakes performance of a work pursuant to a contract in which the owner furnishes plans and specifications, and possesses only the right to insist that the job be performed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Louisiana does not require a specific reference to negligent acts in order for an indemnity agreement or a release to cover claims based on negligent acts. However, the intention of the parties, as inferred from the language of their agreement, must clearly indicate an intention to include negligent acts within the indemnity agreement or the release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.