Tart v. McGann’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.2d 75 · 1982
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2014
7 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bollenbach v. United States · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. City of Chicago · United States v. Mangan · Johnson v. William C. Ellis & Sons Iron Works, Inc. · United States v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“permits the admission of learned treatises as substantive evidence, but only when `an expert is on the stand and available to explain and assist in the application of the treatise....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“`to the extent called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination or relied upon by him in direct examination ...,' as long as it is established that such literature is authoritative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.