United States v. Schuster

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 25, 1983.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-01-25

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2001

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Schuster

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC · Decided 1983-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Sonia Escobio O’Donnell, Jon May, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Robyn Herman, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4(Opinion August 30, 1982, 11 Cir., 1982, 684 F.2d 744)

¶5Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.