Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.3d 110 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[I]nquiry notice' is 'actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent man upon inquiry.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he presentation of these terms at a place and time that the consumer will associate with the initial . . . enrollment, or the use of . . . [the] services from which the recipient benefits at least indicates to the consumer that he or she is . . . employing such services subject to additional terms and conditions that may one day affect him or her.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[CJonduct manifesting [acceptance] may be words or silence, action or inaction, but the conduct of a party is not effective as a manifestation of his [acceptance] unless he intends to engage in the conduct and knows or has reason to know that the other party may infer from his conduct that he [accepts].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.