Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 F.3d 612 - Thomas v. Illinois

Thomas v. Illinois’s Empirical Analysis

697 F.3d 612 · 2012

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Quern v. Jordan · Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. · Boddie v. Schnieder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Depending on how extensive the infestation of a prisoner’s cell is, what the infesting pests are, what odors or bites or risk of disease they create, what particular psychological sensitivities the prisoner was known to have (recall Winston’s unreasoning fear of rats in Nineteen Eighty-Four, a fear exploited by his torturers to break his spirit without actually touching him, Lindale v. Tokheim Corp., 145 F.3d 953 , 955 (7th Cir. 1998)), and how long the infestation con tinues, a trier of fact might reasonably conclude that the prisoner had been subjected to harm sufficient to support a claim of cruel and unusual punishment even if he had not contracted a disease or suffered any physical pain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No Federal civil action may be brought by a prisoner ... for mental or emotional injury ... without a prior showing of physical injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.