Pavlov v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
697 F.3d 616 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ribas v. Mukasey · Cheema v. Holder · Alsagladi v. Gonzales · Siddique v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At least two other courts of appeals have concluded that delivery of this warning in the application itself, or at the time of the interview, suffices. Ribas v. Mukasey, 545 F.3d 922 (10th Cir.2008); Cheema v. Holder, 693 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir.2012). This court said the same thing in Siddique v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 814 (7th Cir.2008). If it was not a holding then, it becomes a holding now.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“knowingly made a frivolous application for asylum ... shall be permanently ineligible for any [immigration] benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.