Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

697 F. App'x 151

United States v. Oluwasegun Ogun

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2017

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2017-08-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division

Decided 2017-08-29

¶1 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶2 Oluwasegun Ogun seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion challenging his criminal judgment as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as successive. The order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit 'justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, *152154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

¶3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ogun has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 DISMISSED

/697/fappx/151 · .json · Public domain