Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 N.W.2d 481 - State v. Philo

State v. Philo’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Santobello v. New York · United States v. Wetterlin · Brainard v. State · State v. Schoelerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “commencing with the first act done directly toward the commission of the [underlying felony] and for the purpose of committing that offense, and terminating when the person has been arrested or has withdrawn from the scene of the intended crime and has eluded pursuers, if any there be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant's admission on the record of the fact supporting an element of an offense is sufficient to provide a factual basis for that element.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) ... trial counsel failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) this failure resulted in prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.