Mark v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2018
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. Morrison · 37 Colo. App. 75 - Dill v. COUNTY COURT IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVER · Driscoll v. Konze · 4 Kan. App. 2d 658 - Clark v. Glazer · Tefft v. Citizens' Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If any action or proceeding is begun within the period fixed by the applicable statute of limitations or the periods provided for in this article, then such action or proceeding may be prosecuted to final decision notwithstanding the fact that the period of limitation shall expire after the commencement and during the prosecution of such action or proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.